Ta-Nehisi Coates explains the concept of white people using the “N” word through his own past experiences of not being able to use words or phrases associated with white people, women, etc. He makes the point that he does not join in with his wife and her friend in using the word “bitch” to talk about others. He knows it is not his place to do so, and he would not feel right doing it, so he doesn’t. Coates uses the same logic when telling a story about his white friends’ cabin that the friend referred to as “the white trash cabin”. Whether he agreed with that statement or not, Ta-Nehisi feels uncomfortable referring to the cabin as “white trash”. He relates these two instances to white people using the “N” word, and how it is not their place right to use it. He claims that white people grow up believing they are entitled to everything (like the right to use the “N” word), when they actually are not.
Oluo makes a similar claim, and states that “people of color can freely say some words that white people cannot without risking risking scorn or condemnation” (141). She is saying that white people should not be using the “N” word, and that is fair. The word itself is centered around racial oppression and discrimination, so “the real unfairness lies in the oppression and inequality that these words helped create and maintain” (141). This discussion between Oluo and Coates is applicable to the learning in this class, because language and how people say things is so important to a message’s overall meaning and understanding. The “N” word has a lot of history and background, which gives it a deeper meaning. Not everyone has the right to say such a word that invokes so much emotion and grief. In this class we are learning that rhetoric controls the way “language shapes the world”, which is apparent in a word such as the “N” word that has such a negative connotation.
